The Gemini built for volume — a million-token window, thinking when you want it, and pricing that survives contact with production traffic.

Key specifications

Capability
87.2
Context window
1.0M
Max output
65.5K
Input $/1M
$0.30
Output $/1M
$2.50
License
Proprietary

Inputs and outputs

Recorded modality support shows what this model can accept and produce. An undocumented modality is shown as unknown rather than assumed to be unsupported.

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output

Capabilities

ReasoningFunction callingVisionAudioJSON mode

What is Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the model you reach for when the job runs a million times, not once.

It keeps the thing that made Gemini 2.5 Pro interesting — a 1,048,576-token context window — and gives up deliberation rather than capacity. That is an unusual trade. Most fast models shrink the window; Flash keeps it and shortens the thinking instead.

The number that decides most projects

Flash's knowledge cutoff is January 2025. For a model serving production traffic today, that is a long time ago, and it is the single fact most teams discover too late.

Google's answer is grounding with Google Search, which Flash supports. Turn it on and the model retrieves current information rather than reciting a stale parameter memory. Leave it off and ask about anything recent, and you will get confident, dated answers. Decide this deliberately — it is not a default you want to inherit by accident.

Where the cost actually goes

Across providers Flash lands near $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, though this moves by provider and region and should be confirmed against your own account before you model a budget.

Two features matter more than the headline rate:

  • Context caching. If you send the same 200-page contract with every question, caching stops you paying full input price each time. On document-heavy workloads this is usually the largest single saving available.
  • Batch API and Flex inference. Work that does not need an answer this second — overnight enrichment, backfills, bulk classification — costs materially less when it is not competing for priority capacity.

Thinking is the lever in the other direction. Flash supports it, and a generous thinking budget erodes exactly the price advantage you chose Flash for.

What it takes in, and what it will not give back

Input is genuinely multimodal: text, images, audio, video and PDFs, with no extraction step in front of the model. A support pipeline can pass a screenshot and a call recording together and ask one question about both.

Output is text. Full stop. Flash does not generate images, does not synthesise speech, and does not support the Live API for real-time bidirectional sessions. If either half of your product needs generated media, that half needs a different model.

Code execution and structured outputs are both supported, so it slots into agent loops and typed pipelines without prompt-engineering the response shape by hand.

When Pro is worth the wait

Flash answers. Pro reasons.

For extraction, routing, classification, tagging and summarisation — tasks with a findable correct answer — Flash is the right call and the latency difference is free money. For work where a wrong answer is expensive and the path to the right one has several steps, Gemini 2.5 Pro earns its slower response.

Specifications

Field Value
Provider Google
Context window 1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output 65,536 tokens
Knowledge cutoff January 2025
Input text, image, audio, video, PDF
Output text
Thinking Supported
Function calling Supported
Structured output Supported
Context caching Supported
Code execution Supported
Search grounding Supported
Batch API Supported
Image / audio generation Not supported
Released June 2025

Pricing and regional availability move often. Treat the figures above as indicative and confirm them against your own account before you commit to a budget.

Compare Flash against everything else in the AI model directory.

How to evaluate Gemini 2.5 Flash

Use the recorded facts as a shortlist, then validate the model against representative inputs and production constraints.

Workload fit

Gemini 2.5 Flash is categorized for Audio-text-to-text, Automatic speech recognition, Image-text-to-text, Image-to-text, Text generation, Text-to-text AI models, Video-text-to-text. Its current record accepts text, image, audio, video, pdf and produces text. Confirm file formats, preprocessing, and provider-specific request schemas before implementation.

Capacity and cost

The directory records 1.0M context and 65.5K maximum output. Listed token prices are $0.30 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Treat missing values as unknown and recheck current commercial terms.

Operational behavior

Recorded output speed is — and time to first token is —. Hosting route, region, prompt length, concurrency, and provider load can materially change both measurements.

Evidence boundary

This page separates sourced model facts from incomplete fields. Benchmark evidence is displayed only when its source is linked and verified. Before choosing Gemini 2.5 Flash, test task quality, tool reliability, safety behavior, data controls, rate limits, and total cost on the exact route you intend to use.

Strengths

  • + 1,048,576-token context — the same window as Pro, without Pro's latency
  • + Context caching cuts the cost of re-sending a large document across many calls
  • + Google Search grounding offsets the January 2025 knowledge cutoff for current facts
  • + Batch API and Flex inference make high-volume, non-urgent work substantially cheaper
  • + Reads text, images, audio, video and PDFs natively; structured output and function calling supported

Limitations

  • Knowledge cutoff is January 2025 — anything later needs Search grounding or your own retrieval
  • Text output only: no image generation, no audio generation, no Live API
  • Thinking budget is a real cost lever — leave it high and the price advantage narrows
  • Output ceiling of 65,536 tokens still forces chunking for book-length generation
  • Published pricing varies by provider and region; treat any single figure as indicative

Frequently asked questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash is a Google model listed in the provider’s public registry. Fast Gemini workhorse for multimodal apps where latency and price matter

Related approved models in Automatic speech recognition. Compare specifications and verify fit for your workload.

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google's low-cost Gemini 3 model with a 1,048,576-token context window, vision support, and $0.30/$2.50 per million token pricing for volume workloads.

1.0M contextCompare

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google's mid-tier Gemini 3 model: 1,048,576-token context, multimodal input, and $1.50/$7.50 per million token pricing for production agent workloads.

1.0M contextCompare

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Google's cheapest Gemini 3 model, with a 1,048,576-token context window and $0.25/$1.50 per million token pricing for high-volume, cost-sensitive work.

1.0M contextCompare

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google's full Gemini 3 Flash model, with a 1,048,576-token context window and $1.50/$9.00 per million token pricing for production-grade agent work.

1.0M contextCompare

Google

Gemini Flash Latest

Google's fast, rolling-updated Gemini model with a 1M-token context window, reasoning, and tool calling at $1.50/$9.00 per million tokens.

1.0M contextCompare

Google

Gemini Flash-Lite Latest

Google's low-cost, high-volume Gemini model at $0.25/$1.50 per million tokens, with a 1M-token context window and reasoning support.

1.0M contextCompare