AI model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google lists 1.05M context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.30 input per 1M tokens, $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B from NVIDIA lists 262.14K context, 262.14K maximum output, $0.00 input per 1M tokens, $0.00 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google: Fast Gemini workhorse for multimodal apps where latency and price matter.

Context
1.05M
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
Output / 1M tokens
$2.50

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B from NVIDIA: Nemotron middle tier for collaborative agents and high-volume reasoning workloads.

Context
262.14K
Max output
262.14K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.00
Output / 1M tokens
$0.00

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

  • Context capacity: 1.05M

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

  • Maximum output: 262.14K
  • Input price: $0.00
  • Output price: $0.00

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemini 2.5 Flash:1.05M

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B:262.14K

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemini 2.5 Flash:65.54K

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B:262.14K

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 2.5 Flash:$0.30

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B:$0.00

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 2.5 Flash:$2.50

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B:$0.00

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemini 2.5 FlashNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Listed pricing routeGoogleNVIDIA
Model familygemini-flashnemotron
Accepted inputstext, image, audio, video, pdftext
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1.05MHigher262.14K
Max output65.54K262.14KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.00Lower
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.00Lower
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedNot documented
Audio inputDocumentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 2.5 Flash if you need larger context. Consider Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B if you need larger maximum output or a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B offers downloadable weights; Gemini 2.5 Flash is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison