AI model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemini 1.5 Pro from Google lists 2M context, 8.19K maximum output, $1.25 input per 1M tokens, $5.00 output per 1M tokens. deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash from deepseek-ai lists 1M context, 384K maximum output, $0.14 input per 1M tokens, $0.28 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google's long-context multimodal model with up to 2M token windows.

Context
2M
Max output
8.19K
Input / 1M tokens
$1.25
Output / 1M tokens
$5.00
Output speed
65 t/s

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Audio input
  • Video input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

  • Context capacity: 2M

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

  • Maximum output: 384K

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemini 1.5 Pro:2M

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash:1M

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemini 1.5 Pro:8.19K

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash:384K

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemini 1.5 Pro and deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemini 1.5 Prodeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash
ProviderGoogledeepseek-ai
Listed pricing routeGoogledeepseek-ai
Model familyGemini 1.5—
Accepted inputstext, image, audio, videotext
Produced outputstexttext
Context window2MHigher1M
Max output8.19K384KHigher
Input price / 1M$1.25$0.14
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.28
Output speed65 t/s—
Time to first token0.90s—
Reasoning modeNot documentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedNot documented
Audio inputDocumentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryNot documented

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 1.5 Pro if you need larger context. Consider deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash if you need larger maximum output. deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash offers downloadable weights; Gemini 1.5 Pro is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison