AI model comparison

DeepSeek Reasoner vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

DeepSeek Reasoner from DeepSeek lists 1M context, 384K maximum output, $0.14 input per 1M tokens, $0.28 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google lists 1.05M context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.30 input per 1M tokens, $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Reasoner

DeepSeek Reasoner from DeepSeek: DeepSeek reasoning model for multi-step analysis, math, coding, and tools.

Context
1M
Max output
384K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.14
Output / 1M tokens
$0.28

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google: Fast Gemini workhorse for multimodal apps where latency and price matter.

Context
1.05M
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
Output / 1M tokens
$2.50

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

DeepSeek Reasoner

  • Maximum output: 384K
  • Input price: $0.14
  • Output price: $0.28

Gemini 2.5 Flash

  • Context capacity: 1.05M

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

DeepSeek Reasoner:1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash:1.05M

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

DeepSeek Reasoner:384K

Gemini 2.5 Flash:65.54K

DeepSeek Reasoner

Input price

Lower listed token rate

DeepSeek Reasoner:$0.14

Gemini 2.5 Flash:$0.30

DeepSeek Reasoner

Output price

Lower listed token rate

DeepSeek Reasoner:$0.28

Gemini 2.5 Flash:$2.50

DeepSeek Reasoner

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for DeepSeek Reasoner and Gemini 2.5 Flash. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationDeepSeek ReasonerGemini 2.5 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Listed pricing routeDeepSeekGoogle
Model familydeepseek-thinkinggemini-flash
Accepted inputstexttext, image, audio, video, pdf
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1M1.05MHigher
Max output384KHigher65.54K
Input price / 1M$0.14Lower$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.28Lower$2.50
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputNot documentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedDocumented
Structured outputNot documentedDocumented
LicenseOpen weightsProprietary

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider DeepSeek Reasoner if you need larger maximum output or a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Consider Gemini 2.5 Flash if you need larger context. DeepSeek Reasoner offers downloadable weights; Gemini 2.5 Flash is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison