AI model comparison

GPT-5.5 vs Fugu Ultra

Compare recorded price, context, output limits, speed, latency, capabilities, and input/output support. Every missing value stays visible, and unsourced benchmarks are excluded.

GPT-5.5 and Fugu Ultra both come up when teams are choosing a model for production work, and the honest answer usually depends on your workload rather than a leaderboard. This page puts their published specifications side by side — context window, token pricing, supported inputs and outputs — so you can see where they actually differ.

Side-by-sideReviewed by our team

OpenAI

GPT-5.5

Default frontier GPT for coding, computer use, research, and knowledge work

Context
1.1M
Max output
128K
Input / 1M
$5.00
Output / 1M
$30.00
Output speed

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

Sakana AI

Fugu Ultra

Quality-first multi-agent model for hard research, analysis, and competitions

Context
1M
Max output
1M
Input / 1M
$5.00
Output / 1M
$30.00
Output speed

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Decision snapshot

This is a directional summary of the values recorded in this directory—not a universal quality verdict. Test the finalists on your own prompts before committing.

Where GPT-5.5 leads in recorded data

  • Context capacity: 1.1M

Where Fugu Ultra leads in recorded data

  • Maximum output: 1M

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

GPT-5.5:1.1M

Fugu Ultra:1M

GPT-5.5

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

GPT-5.5:128K

Fugu Ultra:1M

Fugu Ultra

Input price

Lower recorded price

GPT-5.5:$5.00

Fugu Ultra:$5.00

Same recorded value

Output price

Lower recorded price

GPT-5.5:$30.00

Fugu Ultra:$30.00

Same recorded value

Output speed

Higher recorded throughput

GPT-5.5:

Fugu Ultra:

No complete comparison

Time to first token

Lower recorded latency

GPT-5.5:

Fugu Ultra:

No complete comparison

Intelligence Index

Higher directory index

GPT-5.5:

Fugu Ultra:

No complete comparison

Evidence

Verified shared benchmarks

A score appears only when both records include a verified source. It is not treated as a universal ranking.

These two models haven't been measured on the same benchmark yet, so there's nothing meaningful to chart. Comparing scores from different tests would tell you more about the tests than the models — the specs and pricing above are the better guide here.

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

SpecificationGPT-5.5Fugu Ultra
ProviderOpenAISakana AI
Model familygptfugu
Accepted inputstext, image, pdftext, image
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1.1MRecorded lead1M
Max output128K1MRecorded lead
Intelligence Index
Input price / 1M$5.00$5.00
Output price / 1M$30.00$30.00
Output speed
Time to first token
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedDocumented
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
ReleasedApr 23, 2026Jun 15, 2026

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

On the published numbers, GPT-5.5 accepts the larger context window and Fugu Ultra is cheaper per input token. Which matters more depends on whether your bottleneck is document size or spend — the table above has the exact figures.

Provenance

Sources and data limits

Prices and hosted performance can change. SyncDev records source references and clearly separates documented specifications from measured values; confirm commercial terms with the provider before deployment.

Questions people ask

It compares recorded context and output limits, token prices, output speed, time to first token, Intelligence Index, modality support, tool and structured-output capabilities, release information, and only source-linked benchmarks verified on both records. Missing information is labeled rather than inferred.

Compare a different pair

Choose any two approved model records and review them with the same evidence rules.

Open model comparison