AI model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K2.6

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT from Google lists 262.14K context, 32.77K maximum output, $0.07 input per 1M tokens, $0.34 output per 1M tokens. Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI lists 262.14K context, 262.14K maximum output, $0.95 input per 1M tokens, $4.00 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT from Google: Open Gemma instruction model for efficient chat and self-hosted deployments.

Context
262.14K
Max output
32.77K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.07
Output / 1M tokens
$0.34

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

Moonshot AI

Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI: Multimodal Kimi workhorse for agent loops, coding tasks, and visual context.

Context
262.14K
Max output
262.14K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.95
Output / 1M tokens
$4.00

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

  • Input price: $0.07
  • Output price: $0.34

Kimi K2.6

  • Maximum output: 262.14K

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT:262.14K

Kimi K2.6:262.14K

Same value

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT:32.77K

Kimi K2.6:262.14K

Kimi K2.6

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT:$0.07

Kimi K2.6:$0.95

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT:$0.34

Kimi K2.6:$4.00

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.6. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemma 4 26B A4B ITKimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Listed pricing routeGoogleMoonshot AI
Model familygemmakimi-k2
Accepted inputstext, imagetext, image, video
Produced outputstexttext
Context window262.14K262.14K
Max output32.77K262.14KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.07Lower$0.95
Output price / 1M$0.34Lower$4.00
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedDocumented
LicenseOpen weightsOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemma 4 26B A4B IT if you need a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Consider Kimi K2.6 if you need larger maximum output. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison