AI model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite from Google lists 1.05M context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.30 input per 1M tokens, $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B from NVIDIA lists 1M context, 128K maximum output, $0.00 input per 1M tokens, $0.00 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite from Google: Fast Gemini model balancing multimodal reasoning, tool use, and cost.

Context
1.05M
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
Output / 1M tokens
$2.50

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input
  • Audio input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B from NVIDIA: Largest Nemotron 3 model for maximum open-weight reasoning and agent accuracy.

Context
1M
Max output
128K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.00
Output / 1M tokens
$0.00

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

  • Context capacity: 1.05M

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

  • Maximum output: 128K
  • Input price: $0.00
  • Output price: $0.00

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:1.05M

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B:1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:65.54K

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B:128K

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:$0.30

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B:$0.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:$2.50

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B:$0.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemini 3.5 Flash LiteNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Listed pricing routeGoogleNVIDIA
Model familygemini-flash-litenemotron
Accepted inputstext, image, video, audio, pdftext
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1.05MHigher1M
Max output65.54K128KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.00Lower
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.00Lower
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedNot documented
Audio inputDocumentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if you need larger context. Consider Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B if you need larger maximum output or a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B offers downloadable weights; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison