AI model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview from Google lists 131.07K context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.75 input per 1M tokens, $4.50 output per 1M tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code from Moonshot AI lists 262.14K context, 262.14K maximum output, $0.95 input per 1M tokens, $4.00 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview from Google: High-quality, low-latency Live API model for real-time dialogue and voice-first AI applications.

Context
131.07K
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.75
Output / 1M tokens
$4.50

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input
  • Audio input

Produces

  • Text output
  • Audio output
VS

Moonshot AI

Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code from Moonshot AI: Coding-focused Kimi model, stronger on long-horizon repo work with less overthinking.

Context
262.14K
Max output
262.14K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.95
Output / 1M tokens
$4.00

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

  • Input price: $0.75

Kimi K2.7 Code

  • Context capacity: 262.14K
  • Maximum output: 262.14K
  • Output price: $4.00

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview:131.07K

Kimi K2.7 Code:262.14K

Kimi K2.7 Code

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview:65.54K

Kimi K2.7 Code:262.14K

Kimi K2.7 Code

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview:$0.75

Kimi K2.7 Code:$0.95

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview:$4.50

Kimi K2.7 Code:$4.00

Kimi K2.7 Code

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview and Kimi K2.7 Code. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash Live PreviewKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Listed pricing routeGoogleMoonshot AI
Model familygemini-flashkimi-k2
Accepted inputstext, image, video, audiotext, image, video
Produced outputstext, audiotext
Context window131.07K262.14KHigher
Max output65.54K262.14KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.75Lower$0.95
Output price / 1M$4.50$4.00Lower
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputDocumentedNot documented
Structured outputNot documentedDocumented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview if you need a lower listed input rate. Consider Kimi K2.7 Code if you need larger context or larger maximum output or a lower listed output rate. Kimi K2.7 Code offers downloadable weights; Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison