SSyncDev

AI model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B IT

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Gemini 2.0 Flash from Google lists 1.05M context, 8.19K maximum output, $0.10 input per 1M tokens, $0.40 output per 1M tokens. Gemma 4 31B IT from Google lists 262.14K context, 32.77K maximum output, $0.10 input per 1M tokens, $0.34 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash from Google: Earlier Gemini Flash workhorse for responsive multimodal apps and tool use.

Context
1.05M
Max output
8.19K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.10
Output / 1M tokens
$0.40

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Audio input
  • Video input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
Full model profilegithub.com ↗
VS

Google

Gemma 4 31B IT

Gemma 4 31B IT from Google: Largest Gemma 4 instruction model for open, self-hosted chat and reasoning.

Context
262.14K
Max output
32.77K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.10
Output / 1M tokens
$0.34

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input

Produces

  • Text output
Full model profilegithub.com ↗

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

  • Context capacity: 1.05M

Gemma 4 31B IT

  • Maximum output: 32.77K
  • Output price: $0.34

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Gemini 2.0 Flash:1.05M

Gemma 4 31B IT:262.14K

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Gemini 2.0 Flash:8.19K

Gemma 4 31B IT:32.77K

Gemma 4 31B IT

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 2.0 Flash:$0.10

Gemma 4 31B IT:$0.10

Same value

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Gemini 2.0 Flash:$0.40

Gemma 4 31B IT:$0.34

Gemma 4 31B IT

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 4 31B IT. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationGemini 2.0 FlashGemma 4 31B IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Listed pricing routeGoogleGoogle
Model familygemini-flashgemma
Accepted inputstext, image, audio, video, pdftext, image
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1.05MHigher262.14K
Max output8.19K32.77KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.34Lower
Reasoning modeNot documentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputDocumentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedDocumented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 2.0 Flash if you need larger context. Consider Gemma 4 31B IT if you need larger maximum output or a lower listed output rate. Gemma 4 31B IT offers downloadable weights; Gemini 2.0 Flash is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison