SSyncDev

AI model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest) from Anthropic lists 200K context, 64K maximum output. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite from Google lists 1.05M context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.30 input per 1M tokens, $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest)

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest) from Anthropic: Balanced Claude model for coding, analysis, agent workflows, and cost control.

Context
200K
Max output
64K

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
Full model profilegithub.com ↗
VS

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite from Google: Fast Gemini model balancing multimodal reasoning, tool use, and cost.

Context
1.05M
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
Output / 1M tokens
$2.50

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input
  • Audio input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
Full model profilegithub.com ↗

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

  • Context capacity: 1.05M
  • Maximum output: 65.54K

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest):200K

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:1.05M

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Claude Sonnet 4 (latest):64K

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite:65.54K

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Claude Sonnet 4 (latest) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationClaude Sonnet 4 (latest)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Listed pricing routeAnthropicGoogle
Model familyclaude-sonnetgemini-flash-lite
Accepted inputstext, image, pdftext, image, video, audio, pdf
Produced outputstexttext
Context window200K1.05MHigher
Max output64K65.54KHigher
Input price / 1M—$0.30
Output price / 1M—$2.50
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedDocumented
Structured outputNot documentedDocumented
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if you need larger context or larger maximum output. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison