AI model comparison

Fugu vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Fugu from Sakana AI lists 1M context. MiMo-V2.5-Pro from Xiaomi lists 1.05M context, 131.07K maximum output, $0.435 input per 1M tokens, $0.87 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Sakana AI

Fugu

Fugu from Sakana AI: Multi-agent model for routing expert agents across complex analytical tasks.

Context
1M

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro from Xiaomi: Stronger MiMo Pro tier for multimodal reasoning and coding-agent execution.

Context
1.05M
Max output
131.07K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.435
Output / 1M tokens
$0.87

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • Context capacity: 1.05M

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Fugu:1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro:1.05M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Fugu and MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationFuguMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderSakana AIXiaomi
Listed pricing routeSakana AIXiaomi
Model familyfugumimo
Accepted inputstext, imagetext
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1M1.05MHigher
Max output—131.07K
Input price / 1M—$0.435
Output price / 1M—$0.87
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedNot documented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you need larger context. MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers downloadable weights; Fugu is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison