AI model comparison

Fugu Ultra vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Fugu Ultra from Sakana AI lists 1M context, $5.00 input per 1M tokens, $30.00 output per 1M tokens. Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun lists 256K context, 256K maximum output, $0.185 input per 1M tokens, $1.11 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Sakana AI

Fugu Ultra

Fugu Ultra from Sakana AI: Quality-first multi-agent model for hard research, analysis, and competitions.

Context
1M
Input / 1M tokens
$5.00
Output / 1M tokens
$30.00

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

StepFun

Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun: Newer StepFun flash model for faster agents, coding, and multimodal prompts.

Context
256K
Max output
256K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.185
Output / 1M tokens
$1.11

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Fugu Ultra

  • Context capacity: 1M

Step 3.7 Flash

  • Input price: $0.185
  • Output price: $1.11

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Fugu Ultra:1M

Step 3.7 Flash:256K

Fugu Ultra

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Fugu Ultra:$5.00

Step 3.7 Flash:$0.185

Step 3.7 Flash

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Fugu Ultra:$30.00

Step 3.7 Flash:$1.11

Step 3.7 Flash

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Fugu Ultra and Step 3.7 Flash. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationFugu UltraStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderSakana AIStepFun
Listed pricing routeSakana AIStepFun
Model familyfugu—
Accepted inputstext, imagetext, image, video
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1MHigher256K
Max output—256K
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.185Lower
Output price / 1M$30.00$1.11Lower
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Fugu Ultra if you need larger context. Consider Step 3.7 Flash if you need a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Step 3.7 Flash offers downloadable weights; Fugu Ultra is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison