Mistral AI
Mistral Small (latest)
Efficient Mistral model for fast chat, extraction, and production assistants
- Context
- 256K
- Max output
- 256K
- Input / 1M
- $0.15
- Output / 1M
- $0.60
- Output speed
- —
Accepts
- Text input
- Image input
Produces
- Text output
AI model comparison
Compare recorded price, context, output limits, speed, latency, capabilities, and input/output support. Every missing value stays visible, and unsourced benchmarks are excluded.
Mistral Small (latest) and Kimi K3 both come up when teams are choosing a model for production work, and the honest answer usually depends on your workload rather than a leaderboard. This page puts their published specifications side by side — context window, token pricing, supported inputs and outputs — so you can see where they actually differ.
Mistral AI
Efficient Mistral model for fast chat, extraction, and production assistants
Accepts
Produces
Moonshot AI
Moonshot's frontier model — 2.8 trillion parameters, a million-token window, and thinking effort you can dial up when the task deserves it.
Accepts
Produces
At a glance
This is a directional summary of the values recorded in this directory—not a universal quality verdict. Test the finalists on your own prompts before committing.
Where Mistral Small (latest) leads in recorded data
Where Kimi K3 leads in recorded data
Context capacity
Higher listed limit
Mistral Small (latest):256K
Kimi K3:1.0M
Kimi K3
Maximum output
Higher listed limit
Mistral Small (latest):256K
Kimi K3:131.1K
Mistral Small (latest)
Input price
Lower recorded price
Mistral Small (latest):$0.15
Kimi K3:$3.00
Mistral Small (latest)
Output price
Lower recorded price
Mistral Small (latest):$0.60
Kimi K3:$15.00
Mistral Small (latest)
Output speed
Higher recorded throughput
Mistral Small (latest):—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Time to first token
Lower recorded latency
Mistral Small (latest):—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Intelligence Index
Higher directory index
Mistral Small (latest):—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Evidence
A score appears only when both records include a verified source. It is not treated as a universal ranking.
Specifications
| Specification | Mistral Small (latest) | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Moonshot AI |
| Model family | mistral-small | kimi-k3 |
| Accepted inputs | text, image | text, image, video |
| Produced outputs | text | text |
| Context window | 256K | 1.0MRecorded lead |
| Max output | 256KRecorded lead | 131.1K |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.15Recorded lead | $3.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60Recorded lead | $15.00 |
| Output speed | — | — |
| Time to first token | — | — |
| Reasoning mode | Documented | Documented |
| Tool calling | Documented | Documented |
| Image input | Documented | Documented |
| Audio input | Not documented | Not documented |
| Structured output | Not documented | Documented |
| License | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | Mar 16, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Workload guidance
On the published numbers, Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window and Mistral Small (latest) is cheaper per input token. Which matters more depends on whether your bottleneck is document size or spend — the table above has the exact figures.
Provenance
Prices and hosted performance can change. SyncDev records source references and clearly separates documented specifications from measured values; confirm commercial terms with the provider before deployment.
Mistral Small (latest)
Mistral AI · model record and recorded source
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · model record and recorded source
Choose any two approved model records and review them with the same evidence rules.