Cohere
Command A Plus
Cohere's stronger command model for multilingual agents and enterprise workflows
- Context
- 128K
- Max output
- 64K
- Input / 1M
- $2.50
- Output / 1M
- $10.00
- Output speed
- —
Accepts
- Text input
- Image input
Produces
- Text output
AI model comparison
Compare recorded price, context, output limits, speed, latency, capabilities, and input/output support. Every missing value stays visible, and unsourced benchmarks are excluded.
Command A Plus and Kimi K3 both come up when teams are choosing a model for production work, and the honest answer usually depends on your workload rather than a leaderboard. This page puts their published specifications side by side — context window, token pricing, supported inputs and outputs — so you can see where they actually differ.
Cohere
Cohere's stronger command model for multilingual agents and enterprise workflows
Accepts
Produces
Moonshot AI
Moonshot's frontier model — 2.8 trillion parameters, a million-token window, and thinking effort you can dial up when the task deserves it.
Accepts
Produces
At a glance
This is a directional summary of the values recorded in this directory—not a universal quality verdict. Test the finalists on your own prompts before committing.
Where Command A Plus leads in recorded data
Where Kimi K3 leads in recorded data
Context capacity
Higher listed limit
Command A Plus:128K
Kimi K3:1.0M
Kimi K3
Maximum output
Higher listed limit
Command A Plus:64K
Kimi K3:131.1K
Kimi K3
Input price
Lower recorded price
Command A Plus:$2.50
Kimi K3:$3.00
Command A Plus
Output price
Lower recorded price
Command A Plus:$10.00
Kimi K3:$15.00
Command A Plus
Output speed
Higher recorded throughput
Command A Plus:—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Time to first token
Lower recorded latency
Command A Plus:—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Intelligence Index
Higher directory index
Command A Plus:—
Kimi K3:—
No complete comparison
Evidence
A score appears only when both records include a verified source. It is not treated as a universal ranking.
Specifications
| Specification | Command A Plus | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Model family | command-a | kimi-k3 |
| Accepted inputs | text, image | text, image, video |
| Produced outputs | text | text |
| Context window | 128K | 1.0MRecorded lead |
| Max output | 64K | 131.1KRecorded lead |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2.50Recorded lead | $3.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00Recorded lead | $15.00 |
| Output speed | — | — |
| Time to first token | — | — |
| Reasoning mode | Documented | Documented |
| Tool calling | Documented | Documented |
| Image input | Documented | Documented |
| Audio input | Not documented | Not documented |
| Structured output | Documented | Documented |
| License | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Workload guidance
On the published numbers, Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window and Command A Plus is cheaper per input token. Which matters more depends on whether your bottleneck is document size or spend — the table above has the exact figures.
Provenance
Prices and hosted performance can change. SyncDev records source references and clearly separates documented specifications from measured values; confirm commercial terms with the provider before deployment.
Command A Plus
Cohere · model record and recorded source
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · model record and recorded source
Choose any two approved model records and review them with the same evidence rules.