AI model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs google/gemma-4-31B-it

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic lists 1M context, 128K maximum output, $5.00 input per 1M tokens, $25.00 output per 1M tokens. google/gemma-4-31B-it from google lists 262.14K context, 32.77K maximum output. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic: Stronger Opus tier for advanced software work and high-stakes reasoning.

Context
1M
Max output
128K
Input / 1M tokens
$5.00
Output / 1M tokens
$25.00

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • PDF input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

google

google/gemma-4-31B-it

google/gemma-4-31B-it is a source-linked Hugging Face repository assigned to Image-text-to-text. Its recorded task interface accepts image, text and produces text.

Context
262.14K
Max output
32.77K

Accepts

  • Image input
  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Claude Opus 4.7

  • Context capacity: 1M
  • Maximum output: 128K

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Claude Opus 4.7:1M

google/gemma-4-31B-it:262.14K

Claude Opus 4.7

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Claude Opus 4.7:128K

google/gemma-4-31B-it:32.77K

Claude Opus 4.7

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Claude Opus 4.7 and google/gemma-4-31B-it. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationClaude Opus 4.7google/gemma-4-31B-it
ProviderAnthropicgoogle
Listed pricing routeAnthropicgoogle
Model familyclaude-opus—
Accepted inputstext, image, pdfimage, text
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1MHigher262.14K
Max output128KHigher32.77K
Input price / 1M$5.00—
Output price / 1M$25.00—
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedDocumented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputNot documentedNot documented
LicenseProprietaryNot documented

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Claude Opus 4.7 if you need larger context or larger maximum output. google/gemma-4-31B-it offers downloadable weights; Claude Opus 4.7 is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison