AI model comparison

Qwen3.6 Flash vs GLM-5.1

Compare pricing, context limits, supported inputs and deployment options to choose a model for your workflow.

Qwen3.6 Flash from Alibaba lists 1M context, 65.54K maximum output, $0.1875 input per 1M tokens, $1.125 output per 1M tokens. GLM-5.1 from Z.ai / Zhipu AI lists 200K context, 131.07K maximum output, $1.40 input per 1M tokens, $4.40 output per 1M tokens. Compare the inputs, outputs and deployment options below to see which fits your workflow.

Side-by-sideCapabilities and practical differences

Alibaba

Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash from Alibaba: Qwen vision-language model for visual reasoning, documents, and agent tasks.

Context
1M
Max output
65.54K
Input / 1M tokens
$0.1875
Output / 1M tokens
$1.125

Accepts

  • Text input
  • Image input
  • Video input

Produces

  • Text output
VS

Z.ai / Zhipu AI

GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 from Z.ai / Zhipu AI: Strong GLM coding model for agentic engineering, terminals, and repository generation.

Context
200K
Max output
131.07K
Input / 1M tokens
$1.40
Output / 1M tokens
$4.40

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

At a glance

Key differences

Compare the available figures below, then try both models on the work you need to do.

Qwen3.6 Flash

  • Context capacity: 1M
  • Input price: $0.1875
  • Output price: $1.125

GLM-5.1

  • Maximum output: 131.07K

Context capacity

Higher listed limit

Qwen3.6 Flash:1M

GLM-5.1:200K

Qwen3.6 Flash

Maximum output

Higher listed limit

Qwen3.6 Flash:65.54K

GLM-5.1:131.07K

GLM-5.1

Input price

Lower listed token rate

Qwen3.6 Flash:$0.1875

GLM-5.1:$1.40

Qwen3.6 Flash

Output price

Lower listed token rate

Qwen3.6 Flash:$1.125

GLM-5.1:$4.40

Qwen3.6 Flash

Specifications

Pricing, limits and capabilities

Specifications for Qwen3.6 Flash and GLM-5.1. Higher limits and lower prices describe these figures only.
SpecificationQwen3.6 FlashGLM-5.1
ProviderAlibabaZ.ai / Zhipu AI
Listed pricing routeAlibabaZ.ai / Zhipu AI
Model familyqwen3.6glm
Accepted inputstext, image, videotext
Produced outputstexttext
Context window1MHigher200K
Max output65.54K131.07KHigher
Input price / 1M$0.1875Lower$1.40
Output price / 1M$1.125Lower$4.40
Reasoning modeDocumentedDocumented
Tool callingDocumentedDocumented
Image inputDocumentedNot documented
Audio inputNot documentedNot documented
Structured outputDocumentedDocumented
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights

Workload guidance

Which model should you choose?

Consider Qwen3.6 Flash if you need larger context or a lower listed input rate or a lower listed output rate. Consider GLM-5.1 if you need larger maximum output. GLM-5.1 offers downloadable weights; Qwen3.6 Flash is listed as a proprietary model. Compare licence terms and operating costs before choosing a deployment. Test both on the same representative examples and judge the output against your acceptance criteria. Include tool failures, retries and the time to a completed task.

Documentation and model profiles

Explore each model’s features, API requirements and licence terms in the sources below.

Questions people ask

It brings together documented inputs and outputs, token limits, deployment terms and available pricing. When both models have source-linked, verified results on a shared benchmark, those results are shown with their individual sources. The comparison is a starting point for evaluating your own workload.

Compare a different pair

Search by model or provider to explore another comparison.

Open model comparison