Cohere's RAG workhorse for long-context enterprise search and tool use

Key specifications

Capability
29.4
Context window
128K
Max output
4K
Input $/1M
$2.50
Output $/1M
$10.00
License
Open weights

Inputs and outputs

Recorded modality support shows what this model can accept and produce. An undocumented modality is shown as unknown rather than assumed to be unsupported.

Accepts

  • Text input

Produces

  • Text output

Capabilities

Function callingOpen weights

What is Command R+?

Editorial briefing: Command R+

Cohere's RAG workhorse for long-context enterprise search and tool use This is a source-backed review draft for Command R+ from Cohere. It documents what the registry says and calls out what still needs a human editor to verify; it does not turn unverified fields into product claims.

What the source record says

The source record lists a release date of 2024-08-30 and a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01. It identifies the model family as command-r and describes open weights as available. These fields are useful for narrowing a shortlist, but the linked primary source remains the reference for any current release or policy change.

Interface and modality fit

Command R+ accepts text and returns text according to the registry. That makes the model a potential fit only where those interface assumptions match the product workflow. A team should test its own file types, tool schema, safety settings, and deployment constraints rather than assuming that a listed modality works identically in every provider surface.

Limits and operating assumptions

The listed context window is 128,000 tokens, with a listed maximum output of 4,000 tokens. The source declares tool calling, temperature control. Those flags describe an interface surface; they are not evidence of response quality, speed, tool reliability, or availability.

Recorded evaluation evidence

  • The registry record does not include a benchmark result for this model. That is an evidence gap, not a quality judgement.

A benchmark number is meaningful only alongside its task, harness, date, and source. It should not be treated as a universal ranking, and it should be refreshed before an editor uses it in a comparison or recommendation.

How to evaluate this model

Start with a small, representative test set: the prompts people actually send, the tools the product calls, the languages and files it receives, and the failure modes users care about. Compare output quality, structured-output reliability, latency, token use, safety behavior, and operational support under the same conditions for every candidate. Keep the source link, test date, region, and provider route next to any decision so the review can be repeated later.

Human review checklist

Before approval, an editor should verify the linked source, confirm whether a currently supported API or hosted route exists, add first-party pricing only when it is published, check benchmark provenance, and record any important limitations. If a fact cannot be verified, this page should say so plainly. That protects readers from stale model pages and gives search engines a materially useful, evidence-led resource rather than a generated catalogue entry.

How to evaluate Command R+

Use the recorded facts as a shortlist, then validate the model against representative inputs and production constraints.

Workload fit

Command R+ is categorized for Text generation, Text-to-text AI models. Its current record accepts text and produces text. Confirm file formats, preprocessing, and provider-specific request schemas before implementation.

Capacity and cost

The directory records 128K context and 4K maximum output. Listed token prices are $2.50 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens. Treat missing values as unknown and recheck current commercial terms.

Operational behavior

Recorded output speed is — and time to first token is —. Hosting route, region, prompt length, concurrency, and provider load can materially change both measurements.

Evidence boundary

This page separates sourced model facts from incomplete fields. Benchmark evidence is displayed only when its source is linked and verified. Before choosing Command R+, test task quality, tool reliability, safety behavior, data controls, rate limits, and total cost on the exact route you intend to use.

Strengths

  • + Registry-backed capabilities
  • + Provider: Cohere

Limitations

  • Draft record — editorial review required
  • Verify pricing and independent evaluations before approval

Frequently asked questions

Command R+ is a Cohere model listed in the provider’s public registry. Cohere's RAG workhorse for long-context enterprise search and tool use

Related approved models in Text-to-text AI models. Compare specifications and verify fit for your workload.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

The 2024 Sonnet that set the standard for practical coding work — now well behind the current Claude line at identical pricing.

200K contextCompare

OpenAI

GPT-4o

OpenAI's omni-era workhorse — text and image in, text out, with a cached-input rate that halves the cost of repeated context.

128K contextCompare

Meta

Llama 3.1 405B

Meta's largest open-weights model, competitive with frontier closed models.

128K contextCompare

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Official DeepSeek V4 Flash release with enhanced agentic capabilities and integrated DSpark speculative decoding

1M contextCompare